OPINION: Working Man’s Jeans

By Bruce L. Brager

I bought a new pair of work jeans a few months ago, the day before Cyber Monday, the day after Small Business Saturday, two days after Black Friday. In fact I have been wearing them for the past two hours, as I write this. I work at home and wear them, so it is appropriate to call them work clothes.

Judging by the inspection stickers, these pants seem to have been inspected 6 times:

• Proudly inspected by 11 (I would hate to have someone not proudly inspect something I use to cover my behind), and 13.
• Proudly inspected by 20 – twice.
• Inspecciondo por 23 and 74.

I hope all five (remember, 20 looked twice) did their jobs.

The only address listed on the pants label gives the address of the company, still in Michigan where the company was started in 1889. No “made in …” label, which it really should have. Three of my other products from this company fess up to their Latin American origin. Ideally, I prefer made in the USA, but this is not always possible with today’s production realities. Americans also have a certain interest, though we may not always realize it, in having good, or at least decent, jobs in Mexico and Latin America. Globalization is a reality of modern life; and people usually don’t emigrate if they have good jobs at home.

This company has not made the news, so I have to assume their Latin American employees are treated reasonably well.

Anyway, as I write this the jeans are sitting above a pair of Australian made shoes. All of them were purchased from small businesses, though not on Small Business Saturday.

I have bought four pairs of pants from this company, which I still have, so they seem to make a good product. My three shirts are holding out well also. Two past shirts lived satisfactory life times.  Basic realities of salesmanship are you sell what the product does for the customer, what needs it meets, product quality and price. People, even me, pay less attention to the deeper meaning of the purchase. My need was for clothing. I wanted good quality for a reasonable price.

The company originally made clothing for railroad workers, but apparently became popular in this country because “the boys in the hood” saw them being worn by crack dealers. These “small businessmen” have to keep warm at work, on the streets, and carry a lot of “work materials.” The company seems to be gaining popularity with “hipsters” – I think this means the same thing as it did circa 1960, fashionable, trendy, independent, counter-culture but not absurdly so, etc. “Hippy” has a somewhat different, and a less pompous, meaning. The clothing is still aimed at people who work with their hands – their carpenter pants tend to be worn by real carpenters -- rather than with computers, but I guess this is expanding to include artisans and related “new” professions. Today, though, even those who make artisanal food still use computers for something. Even independent carpenters will likely do book keeping and scheduling electronically. I suppose people who wear these pants identify with the various cultures who first wore them – though I hope not too many identify with crack dealers. It’s an image. It’s the same way country singers, particularly men, favor jeans when even those with less money than Garth Brooks can dress quite well. I don’t recall seeing a picture of Hank Williams in blue jeans. His generation of country singers dressed up.

Does “casual Friday” in Nashville mean three pieces suits?

Actually, people make too big a deal about how other people dress. One should be able to dress comfortably at work, so you can concentrate on the work. My old job, at a large DC international agency had it right. Wear what you want, unless you are meeting with clients. The desirability of showing respect for a client trumps comfort. As a freelance writer, in some ways I work for an idiot. But at least he is liberal on the dress code and lets me wear what I want.

My experience is that this company makes good clothing. The pants are quite comfortable. If my fashions show the desire to identify with previous wearers, I have to admit I prefer railroad workers and carpenters to drug dealers. I wish they were made in the United States, but will live with Latin America. At least I was able to buy them from a small local business.

The personal needs they meet are well made, comfortable, and not costing too much. No message, no political points. Can one ask for better results?

---

All opinion pieces reflect solely the views of the writer(s) and do not reflect the opinions or views of CAB News Online.

OPINION: Another View of Robert E. Lee

By Bruce L. Brager

Appomattox Court House

We are just a few weeks from the 150^th anniversary of the effective end of the American Civil War, April 9, 2014, when Robert E. Lee surrendered the Army of North Virginia to Federal forces under Ulysses S. Grant.  The general mainstream media is almost totally ignoring the anniversary, but the chance it gives us to examine the degree to which we have learned the lessons of the war.

Slavery is gone, never to return, as least in this country. However, in some ways civil rights seems to be moving backwards. In an irony, considering the party which most strongly advocated civil rights, Republicans in their controlled states are making it harder to vote. They claim to be fighting voter fraud, regardless of the fact that virtually no people have voted illegally in recent years. In this country, just under half of Americans do not bother to vote at all. Many Americans don’t care enough to vote early or to vote in elections at all.

Our dear Supreme Court, showing flashes of the perception which gave us the Dred Scott decision, invalidated parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, helping states limit minority voting. I guess we will just have to rely on the Fifteenth Amendment, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,”  

Secession is dead; though counties trying to secede from states seems to be the newest in thing in some western states – such as in Colorado and in California.          

Federal law trumps state law, according to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution found in Article VI, Paragraph 1. Missouri thinks this does not apply to federal gun laws.

Didn’t you think this ended in April 1865? Lee’s surrender at Appomattox ended a nasty and bloody war. For this alone, it is a good thing.  Lee’s surrender at Appomattox also provided an opportunity for true sectional and racial unity, a chance to live up to the promises of the Declaration of Independence. This chance was blown, needing the “Second Reconstruction” of the 1960s to come close. Elizabeth R. Varon’s new book, Appomattox, points out that Robert E. Lee laid the groundwork, probably intentionally, for the century of little progress on giving true freedom to the freed slaves.

I had always wondered why Lee was so admired. He fought against his country – there no better way of putting things. Every indication is that he was not opposed to slavery, or was at least happy to live with the benefits.  He can probably be described as a white racist. But, sadly, this did not make him unique. Lee’s prestige did, however, make him unique.

Lee ended the war being compared favorably to Ulysses S. Grant, forgetting that Lee lost a greater percentage of men under his command than Grant lost of men under his command.  Lee was by most measures a good general, but with an uncertain understanding of the best national strategy for the South. Actively defeating the North was unlikely, but using the Confederacy’s huge territory, larger than the North east of the Mississippi, provided a real chance to hold out until the North grew tired of the war. Lee preferred to attack and to raid the North. He ended up with the strategic defeat at Antietam, and the clear tactical defeat at Gettysburg.

Lee surrendered his army when they were cut off from any direction they could move with any chance of escape. He was outmaneuvered by Grant. His farewell address told his men the army had been crushed by overwhelming numbers; apparently this came as a surprise. The number of 8,000 was accepted as the final combat strength of the Army of Northern Virginia. Of course, Lee asked Grant for 25,000 rations. The claims of overwhelming odds ignored the sizable number of Confederate soldiers killed or taken prisoner at the battles of Five Forks and Sailor’s Creek, when Grant’s forces sliced large chunks off the Confederate Army like one might slice a holiday ham.  I wonder if anyone even knows how many Southerners deserted this lost cause in the last week.

Lee agreed to stop a bloody war that he could no longer win. He discouraged his men from feeling to fight as partisans. He encouraged the other main Confederate armies to surrender. He deserves credit for all of this, probably major credit. However, as wager, as HoHoVaron makes clear, Lee deserves blame for failing to put his prestige behind true racial and social reform in the South. Lee was by no means alone, but he might have done a lot more to earn his reputation as a symbol of national reconciliation.

A review essay on:

Elizabeth  R. Varon

Appomattox: Victory, Defeat, and Freedom at the End of the Civil War

New York: Oxford University Press 2014

---

All opinion pieces reflect solely the views of the writer(s) and do not reflect the opinions or views of CAB News Online.